On this page
At a glance
- Every allegation is investigated following COPE flowcharts.
- Reports can be confidential or anonymous.
- Authors always get the chance to respond.
- Report a concern to
- redaksi@sarimedika.com
Journal of Educational Science and Development investigates every allegation of research or publication misconduct, whether it concerns a submitted manuscript or a published article, following COPE's flowcharts and its guidance on cooperation with research institutions.
What counts as misconduct
- Fabrication: making up data or results.
- Falsification: manipulating materials, images, data or analysis so that the research is not accurately represented.
- Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism and duplicate publication.
- Image manipulation beyond acceptable adjustments of brightness or contrast applied to the whole image.
- Authorship misconduct: ghost, guest or gift authorship, or adding authors without their consent.
- Undisclosed conflicts of interest.
- Citation manipulation: excessive or irrelevant self-citation, or citations requested by reviewers or editors to boost their own metrics.
- Peer review manipulation, such as fake reviewer accounts.
- Research without the required ethical approval or consent.
- Use of a paper mill or purchase of authorship.
How to report
Send your concern to redaksi@sarimedika.com, with as much detail and evidence as possible. You may report anonymously; we only need enough information to investigate. Allegations are handled confidentially, and whistle-blowers acting in good faith are protected.
How an allegation is handled
- The editor acknowledges the report and checks whether it relates to the journal and has substance.
- The editor gathers the facts, consulting reviewers or experts where needed, without prejudging the outcome.
- The authors are told about the concern and given the chance to respond.
- If the response is unsatisfactory, the editor contacts the authors' institution and asks it to investigate.
- The editor decides on the action, in proportion to what was found.
Possible outcomes
- No action, if the concern is unfounded; the authors are told.
- An explanation or education for minor issues arising from misunderstanding.
- Rejection of the manuscript before publication.
- A correction, expression of concern or retraction after publication.
- Notifying the authors' institution, funders or other journals affected.
- In serious cases, a temporary ban on submissions from the authors.
Official references
This policy follows these published standards and guidelines. Each link opens the original source.